SCIMAPS RESEARCH RESOURCES

Compare research tools

Compare documented capabilities across research software. A resource by SciMaps to help researchers choose appropriate tools—not declare a universal winner.

Browse capabilities and evidence

Definitions apply equally to every product. “Not verified” records uncertainty, not absence. Open a cell’s evidence for restrictions, provenance and dates.

The table scrolls horizontally on narrow screens. Focus this region and use the arrow keys to scroll.

Documented research-tool capabilities
Capability and definitionBibliometrix / BiblioshinyLitmapsResearchGateResearchRabbitSciMapsVOSviewer
Literature discoveryTopic-based paper search

Accept a textual topic or keyword query and return scholarly publication records. Exact-title or DOI lookup alone is insufficient.

Supported

OpenAlex text-query builder

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Topic-based paper search

Official release notes document Biblioshiny OpenAlex title, abstract and default-search text filters, including exact-match options.

Limitations: Provider access and query support vary; this is not evidence of exhaustive coverage.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • OpenAlex query controls documented for Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny 5.5.0; provider access conditions apply.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Article search

Evidence for Litmaps: Topic-based paper search

Litmaps documents searching its article catalogue to begin literature exploration.

Limitations: Search filters and usage depend on access.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Topic-based paper search

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish topic-based paper search under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Keyword-to-seed search

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Topic-based paper search

The search guide documents keyword results that can be selected as seeds.

Limitations: Advanced search controls may depend on access.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Basic keyword search is documented; advanced search settings require RR+.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Bounded paper search

Evidence for SciMaps: Topic-based paper search

The search service implements paper queries with metadata-provider enrichment.

Limitations: Source inspection only; indexed and enriched results are bounded.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Provider API queries

Evidence for VOSviewer: Topic-based paper search

The desktop Create Map workflow supports keyword queries through selected bibliographic APIs.

Limitations: Query options vary by provider.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Desktop 1.6.21; provider access conditions apply.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Literature discoveryCitation-based discovery

Starting from a publication, identify references or citing publications and expose their records. Specify supported directions and scope.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Citation-based discovery

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish citation-based discovery under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Citation and reference connections

Evidence for Litmaps: Citation-based discovery

Litmaps documents discovery using citation and reference connections between papers.

Limitations: Coverage depends on indexed citation metadata.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Citations to your work

Evidence for ResearchGate: Citation-based discovery

Citation statistics expose publications citing a researcher's work.

Limitations: This evidence concerns citations to your research, not unrestricted traversal of every paper.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

References and citing papers

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Citation-based discovery

Article details exposes Refs and Cited by lists and visualizations; papers can be saved or used as seeds.

Limitations: Available records depend on indexed citation metadata.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

References and citing papers

Evidence for SciMaps: Citation-based discovery

Project services import references or citing papers from a starting DOI.

Limitations: Provider/reference coverage and import time limits apply; not continuous monitoring.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Citation-based discovery

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish citation-based discovery under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Literature discoveryRelated-paper exploration

Produce related-paper suggestions from seed publications through a documented recommendation or similarity workflow.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Related-paper exploration

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish related-paper exploration under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Connection-based discovery

Evidence for Litmaps: Related-paper exploration

Documented discovery algorithms use shared citations/references, common authors or similar text to suggest related papers.

Limitations: Algorithm access and filters vary; a common-author recommendation is not itself co-authorship analysis.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Related-paper exploration

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish related-paper exploration under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Iterative seed recommendations

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Related-paper exploration

Selected seed papers drive successive related-paper suggestions.

Limitations: Results depend on seeds and selections; relevance is not completeness.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for SciMaps: Related-paper exploration

The inspected SciMaps workspace and feed services establish owned collections and social sharing. This review did not establish related-paper exploration under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Related-paper exploration

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish related-paper exploration under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Literature discoverySaved literature collections

Persist selected publications for later retrieval and organization. Temporary search results alone do not qualify.

Supported

Saved and reloaded collection files

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Saved literature collections

Included help documents exporting and reloading processed collections, with filtering and subsetting.

Limitations: Local collection files are established; this is not evidence of an account-based hosted library.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Upstream help inspected 2026-10-20; installed releases may differ.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Saved maps and tags

Evidence for Litmaps: Saved literature collections

Imported articles can be saved to maps and tags for later exploration.

Limitations: Suggested but unsaved papers are not included in shared maps.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Private saved list

Evidence for ResearchGate: Saved literature collections

ResearchGate profiles include a private saved-publication list.

Limitations: The saved list is private; this is not evidence of shared collection editing.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Collections and subcollections

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Saved literature collections

Papers can be organized in persistent collections and subcollections.

Limitations: A paper may be copied or moved between collections.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Owner-scoped literature projects

Evidence for SciMaps: Saved literature collections

Project services persist and manage selected research papers.

Limitations: A private owner-scoped project is distinct from social paper sharing.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Saved maps; collection organization unverified

Evidence for VOSviewer: Saved literature collections

Saving and reopening publication maps is documented. Organization as a persistent literature collection was not established under this row definition.

Limitations: Map persistence alone does not establish all collection-management requirements; no absence is inferred.

Delivery: Not verified

Access and version:
  • Desktop 1.6.21.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Literature discoveryLiterature monitoring

Automatically revisit saved research interests or collections and notify users of newly identified literature. Manual refresh alone does not qualify.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Literature monitoring

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish literature monitoring under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Automatic email monitoring

Evidence for Litmaps: Literature monitoring

Monitor sends email updates when new relevant articles are identified.

Limitations: Verify monitoring access and settings for the selected plan.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Literature monitoring

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish literature monitoring under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Literature monitoring

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish literature monitoring under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for SciMaps: Literature monitoring

The inspected SciMaps workspace and feed services establish owned collections and social sharing. This review did not establish literature monitoring under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Literature monitoring

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish literature monitoring under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Bibliometric analysisCo-citation mapping

Calculate joint-citation relationships and expose an inspectable network or analytical output. State entities and citation scope.

Supported

Documents, authors and sources

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Co-citation mapping

Biblioshiny documents co-citation analysis at document, author and source levels.

Limitations: Available fields and the installed interface version determine applicable methods.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Co-citation mapping

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish co-citation mapping under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Co-citation mapping

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish co-citation mapping under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Co-citation mapping

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish co-citation mapping under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Scoped citation analysis

Evidence for SciMaps: Co-citation mapping

The analysis service computes co-citation relationships with explicit aggregation and safeguards.

Limitations: Counts joint citations among papers retained in the prepared corpus; external references outside that corpus do not become nodes. Reference loading and metadata coverage affect results.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Bibliometric networks

Evidence for VOSviewer: Co-citation mapping

VOSviewer documents constructing co-citation networks.

Limitations: Input metadata and reference availability determine applicable network types.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Bibliometric analysisBibliographic coupling

Calculate relationships from shared references and expose an inspectable network or analytical output.

Supported

Shared-reference analysis

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Bibliographic coupling

Biblioshiny documents bibliographic coupling under intellectual structure analysis.

Limitations: Available fields and the installed interface version determine applicable methods.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Bibliographic coupling

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish bibliographic coupling under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Bibliographic coupling

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish bibliographic coupling under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Bibliographic coupling

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish bibliographic coupling under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Scoped shared references

Evidence for SciMaps: Bibliographic coupling

The coupling service computes shared-reference relationships and records method information.

Limitations: Reference completeness and bounded intermediate work affect availability.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Shared-reference networks

Evidence for VOSviewer: Bibliographic coupling

VOSviewer documents constructing bibliographic coupling networks.

Limitations: Input metadata and reference availability determine applicable network types.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Bibliometric analysisCo-authorship analysis

Derive inspectable collaboration relationships from publication authorship. Profiles or recommendations alone do not qualify.

Supported

Authors, institutions and countries

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Co-authorship analysis

Biblioshiny documents co-authorship networks at several aggregation levels.

Limitations: Available fields and the installed interface version determine applicable methods.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Co-authorship analysis

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish co-authorship analysis under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Co-authorship analysis

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish co-authorship analysis under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Co-authorship analysis

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish co-authorship analysis under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Multiple aggregation units

Evidence for SciMaps: Co-authorship analysis

The service derives author, organization and country collaboration relationships.

Limitations: Affiliation and author metadata constrain coverage.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Collaboration networks

Evidence for VOSviewer: Co-authorship analysis

VOSviewer documents constructing co-authorship networks.

Limitations: Input metadata and reference availability determine applicable network types.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Bibliometric analysisKeyword co-occurrence

Calculate relationships between terms occurring together across a defined document collection. State term sources and counting method.

Supported

Co-word analysis

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Keyword co-occurrence

Included help documents author keywords (DE), Keywords Plus (ID), title words and abstract words. Edge weights reflect within-document co-occurrence frequency, with optional normalization.

Limitations: This describes the inspected upstream help; fields and normalization choices must be checked against the installed release.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Upstream help inspected 2026-10-20; not a guarantee for every installed release.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Keyword co-occurrence

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish keyword co-occurrence under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Keyword co-occurrence

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish keyword co-occurrence under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Keyword co-occurrence

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish keyword co-occurrence under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Defined keyword sources

Evidence for SciMaps: Keyword co-occurrence

Title terms, abstract terms, OpenAlex concepts or combined sources use document-frequency full counting with within-document term deduplication.

Limitations: Interpret results using the selected keyword source and corpus.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Term co-occurrence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Keyword co-occurrence

Keyword networks can use bibliographic keywords; text-based term networks use titles and abstracts. Counting choices depend on that workflow.

Limitations: Full/fractional choices apply to bibliographic networks; binary/full term counting belongs to the text-data workflow. Record the selected source and method.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Bibliometric analysisDescriptive bibliometrics

Produce publication counts by year and at least one research entity for a defined collection. Individual profile statistics alone are insufficient.

Supported

Collection metrics

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Descriptive bibliometrics

Biblioshiny documents collection indicators, entity metrics and publication trends.

Limitations: Available fields and the installed interface version determine applicable methods.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Descriptive bibliometrics

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish descriptive bibliometrics under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Descriptive bibliometrics

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish descriptive bibliometrics under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Descriptive bibliometrics

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish descriptive bibliometrics under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Year and entity counts

Evidence for SciMaps: Descriptive bibliometrics

Descriptive services calculate publication-year and research-entity counts for scoped papers.

Limitations: Citation totals grouped by publication year are not citations received in each historical year.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Descriptive bibliometrics

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish descriptive bibliometrics under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Data and interoperabilityBibliographic file import

Ingest a documented structured bibliographic format into publication records. Distinguish full-record import from DOI extraction.

Supported

Source-specific bibliographic records

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Bibliographic file import

Bibliometrix documents conversion of bibliographic export files into a structured publication data frame.

Limitations: Formats and fields depend on the originating bibliographic provider.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

BibTeX, RIS and PubMed

Evidence for Litmaps: Bibliographic file import

Litmaps documents importing bibliographic records from BibTeX, RIS and PubMed files.

Limitations: Available metadata depends on the input records.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Bibliographic file import

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish bibliographic file import under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

BibTeX import

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Bibliographic file import

The guide documents importing a BibTeX file and selecting its papers as seeds.

Limitations: Check resolved papers before saving the resulting collection.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Mapped CSV, TSV and XLSX

Evidence for SciMaps: Bibliographic file import

Spreadsheet import maps bibliographic fields into project records, rather than only extracting DOIs.

Limitations: A mapped DOI column and valid DOI values are required; optional hints include title, creator, year and publication. First XLSX sheet; 2 MiB, 5,000 rows and 50 columns.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Database and reference-manager files

Evidence for VOSviewer: Bibliographic file import

The manual documents bibliographic database files and reference-manager formats including RIS.

Limitations: RIS/reference-manager inputs lack the data required for citation-based network links.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Desktop 1.6.21.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Data and interoperabilityReusable publication export

Export publication records containing identifiers and bibliographic fields in a documented machine-readable format. Screenshots alone do not qualify.

Supported

CSV, XLSX and collection data

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Reusable publication export

Included help documents exporting processed bibliographic collections as CSV, XLSX or R data files.

Limitations: Exported fields depend on imported bibliographic metadata; verify the inspected help against your installed release.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Upstream help inspected 2026-10-20; installed releases may differ.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

BibTeX, RIS or CSV

Evidence for Litmaps: Reusable publication export

Saved publication records can be exported in several bibliographic formats.

Limitations: An exported bibliography is distinct from a methodological report.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Reusable publication export

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish reusable publication export under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

BibTeX, RIS or CSV

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Reusable publication export

Selected publication records can be exported in documented bibliographic formats.

Limitations: A collection screenshot is a separate visual output.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Project-source CSV

Evidence for SciMaps: Reusable publication export

Selected project sources can be exported as Scopus-style CSV.

Limitations: This is not a claim that every module exports RIS or BibTeX.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Reusable publication export

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish reusable publication export under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Research workflowsShared collection editing

Allow at least two accounts to add or remove publications in the same persistent collection. Read-only sharing alone does not qualify.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Shared collection editing

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish shared collection editing under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Team workspaces

Evidence for Litmaps: Shared collection editing

Team editor roles can edit shared maps and tags.

Limitations: Read-only public links are a separate sharing workflow.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • Team subscription; editors need access to the relevant workspace.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchGate: Shared collection editing

The reviewed ResearchGate documentation establishes researcher profiles, saved publications and professional activity. This review did not establish shared collection editing under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Editor and viewer roles

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Shared collection editing

Collection owners can invite collaborators with editor or viewer permissions.

Limitations: Shared collection notes and subcollections are included; choose permissions deliberately.

Delivery: Native

Access and version:
  • An account and collection editor permission are required; the reviewed free tier includes shared collections.

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for SciMaps: Shared collection editing

The inspected SciMaps workspace and feed services establish owned collections and social sharing. This review did not establish shared collection editing under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Shared collection editing

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish shared collection editing under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Academic networkingResearcher profiles

Provide persistent researcher pages with identity or affiliation information and scholarly works. A graph author label alone is insufficient.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Researcher profiles

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish researcher profiles under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Researcher profiles

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish researcher profiles under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Research identity and works

Evidence for ResearchGate: Researcher profiles

Profiles include research background and publications.

Limitations: Profile content and publication coverage depend on available records and user contributions.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Researcher profiles

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish researcher profiles under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Researcher network profiles

Evidence for SciMaps: Researcher profiles

Network services maintain researcher identity and scholarly profile records.

Limitations: Source inspection does not establish identity verification or complete coverage.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Researcher profiles

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish researcher profiles under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Academic networkingAcademic activity and following

Let users follow researchers or research interests and receive an activity stream or research updates.

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny: Academic activity and following

The reviewed Biblioshiny and package documentation establishes bibliometric collection analysis. This review did not establish academic activity and following under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for Litmaps: Academic activity and following

The reviewed Litmaps documentation establishes discovery, maps, imports and monitoring. This review did not establish academic activity and following under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Researcher activity updates

Evidence for ResearchGate: Academic activity and following

Following researchers supplies publication and activity updates in the Home Feed.

Limitations: Membership and personalization influence available activity.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for ResearchRabbit: Academic activity and following

The reviewed ResearchRabbit guides establish seed-based discovery, collections and sharing. This review did not establish academic activity and following under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Supported

Feed and network following

Evidence for SciMaps: Academic activity and following

Network following and feed services implement academic activity workflows.

Limitations: Activity is subject to audience and access checks.

Delivery: Native

Evidence basis: Source inspection. Assessment dated . Review due .

Not verified

Not established by reviewed evidence

Evidence for VOSviewer: Academic activity and following

The reviewed VOSviewer documentation establishes map construction, visualization and bibliographic inputs. This review did not establish academic activity and following under the operational definition shown in the row.

Limitations: No absence is inferred. Confirm the specific task, access conditions and methodology with the provider before relying on it.

Delivery: Not verified

Evidence basis: Documentation. Assessment dated . Review due .

Choose by research task

Different tools can contribute at different stages. These guides explain where documented workflows fit.

Co-citation mapping

Start with a defined collection and reference data suitable for the question. Co-citation links reflect joint citation by other papers; they are not the same relationship as shared-reference coupling or a general related-paper recommendation. VOSviewer and Biblioshiny document co-citation analysis, while the cited SciMaps implementation also provides scoped co-citation analysis. Compare supported entities, counting choices, reference coverage and the corpus boundary before interpreting a map. A discovery service may help identify candidate literature first, but its visual recommendations should not be relabelled as co-citation analysis without methodological evidence. Preserve the source data and describe the actual settings used when reporting findings.

Sources: VOSviewer features; Biblioshiny workflow and analytics; SciMaps co-citation implementation

Literature discovery

Use topic search to establish starting papers, then decide whether citation traversal, related-paper suggestions or monitoring best fits the next step. ResearchRabbit documents iterative searches that develop from selected seeds. Litmaps documents connection-based discovery and monitoring. These workflows can complement a bibliometric analysis rather than substitute for it. Keep a record of the papers accepted into your collection and distinguish saved records from suggestions. If you move literature between products, verify both the export format and the receiving tool's import requirements; matching file extensions do not guarantee that reference fields survive. Recommendations can broaden exploration but do not establish that a search is exhaustive.

Sources: How to search in ResearchRabbit; How to share papers and collections; Litmaps features; Import Articles into Litmaps; Export Articles from Litmaps

Academic networking

For networking, first consider whether the task is maintaining a researcher identity, following colleagues, sharing a publication or discussing research. ResearchGate documents profiles, publication activity and researcher following. SciMaps has source-inspected profile and feed implementations, whose deployment behavior was not exercised here. A collaboration graph derived from publication metadata is a different task from a social connection between accounts. Likewise, sharing a paper does not prove that colleagues can edit the same literature project. A research network can help communicate work produced with a separate analysis tool. Check audience settings and the rights to share full text before choosing a sharing workflow.

Sources: What is my Profile?; Following researchers; SciMaps researcher network implementation; SciMaps academic feed implementation

Systematic literature review

Treat discovery, screening, extraction, appraisal and synthesis as distinct stages. Literature maps and recommendations may contribute papers to a search, but inclusion in this comparison does not establish support for an entire systematic-review process. Define a protocol, retain search and selection records, and verify the specific controls required for your review. Biblioshiny documents a search-to-synthesis workflow and selection information; inspect those functions against your protocol rather than assuming methodological compliance. ResearchRabbit and Litmaps can support exploratory discovery and literature organization. If another system handles screening or extraction, check the handoff fields and document the transfer. No universal product recommendation follows from the capability matrix.

Sources: Biblioshiny workflow and analytics; How to search in ResearchRabbit; Litmaps features

Bibliometric reporting

Decide whether you need a figure, reusable records or an interpretive report. These outputs serve different purposes: a network screenshot is not a methods section, and a bibliography export is not an analytical explanation. Bibliometrix documents report outputs; SciMaps source defines PDF and DOCX report formats, with module-specific content. VOSviewer documents network visualization and image outputs that can be incorporated into an independently written report. Check the actual output for corpus definition, coverage, counting settings and missing data. Describe citation measures precisely: current totals grouped by publication year should not be reported as citations received in each historical year. Select an output workflow that preserves the evidence your reader needs.

Sources: Bibliometrix overview; SciMaps report formats; SciMaps descriptive analysis implementation; VOSviewer features; SciMaps descriptive report export implementation

About the products

Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny

Official Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny website

Product details for Bibliometrix / Biblioshiny

Bibliometrix is an R-based bibliometric analysis toolkit; Biblioshiny provides its graphical web interface. Its documented workflows include importing bibliographic records, descriptive analysis and science mapping. It is relevant when a researcher already has, or can retrieve, a defined bibliographic collection and wants to investigate its structure. The package and interface are related but distinct: an R function should not be assumed to appear in every interface version. Check the documented data source, method and output before choosing a workflow.

Limitations: Data-source fields and interface versions affect available analyses. This comparison does not establish shared collection editing or continuous literature alerts.

Sources: Bibliometrix overview; Biblioshiny workflow and analytics; Bibliometrix data importing and converting

Litmaps

Official Litmaps website

Product details for Litmaps

Litmaps supports literature discovery through paper connections, visual maps and saved literature. Its documentation describes importing existing records, exporting publications and monitoring for new research. It is relevant to exploratory searching and keeping a developing reading collection current. Shared links and editable Team workspaces are different workflows, with different access requirements. A discovery map does not by itself establish that the product performs each formal bibliometric analysis listed here; consult the capability definition and evidence rather than inferring methods from appearance.

Limitations: Advanced search and Team collaboration have access restrictions. Graphical discovery is not treated as proof of co-citation, coupling or thematic-analysis controls.

Sources: Litmaps features; Import Articles into Litmaps; Export Articles from Litmaps; Litmaps Teams

ResearchGate

Official ResearchGate website

Product details for ResearchGate

ResearchGate is a research network centered on researcher profiles, publications and professional activity. Its documented workflows include following researchers, discovering research, sharing work and participating in discussions. Researchers can keep a private saved list of publications. These networking and visibility workflows can complement a separate literature-analysis tool. Personal citation statistics are not the same task as bibliometric analysis of an independently selected collection, and this resource does not infer absent analytical functionality merely because the networking documentation does not describe it.

Limitations: Full-text access and citation visibility depend on available content. Personal profile statistics do not establish collection-wide bibliometric analysis.

Sources: What is ResearchGate?; What is my Profile?; Following researchers; Citations

ResearchRabbit

Official ResearchRabbit website

Product details for ResearchRabbit

ResearchRabbit supports iterative literature discovery from keywords, seed papers and existing collections. Researchers can organize papers into collections and subcollections, explore recommendations and share collections with viewer or editor roles. Its guides document importing BibTeX and exporting bibliographic records. It is relevant when a literature search develops through successive paper selections rather than a single final query. Recommendations and visual maps should be interpreted as discovery aids; their presence alone does not establish a configurable implementation of every bibliometric method.

Limitations: Recommendation relevance depends on seeds and selections. Current monitoring, bulk DOI input and formal bibliometric reporting were not established by the reviewed guides.

Sources: ResearchRabbit features; How to search in ResearchRabbit; Organizing articles with Collections; How to share papers and collections; Citations and references in ResearchRabbit; ResearchRabbit free tier and RR+

SciMapsPublisher

Official SciMaps website

Explore SciMaps research tools

Product details for SciMaps

SciMaps combines literature projects, bibliometric analysis and academic networking. Source inspection identifies search, bounded reference and citing-paper imports, network analyses, descriptive results and report/export implementations. These findings establish implemented paths at a named repository revision; they are not a live verification of the current deployment. Researchers should check metadata coverage, the selected corpus and each method before interpreting results. Social sharing and project collaboration are distinct: a feed sharing feature does not establish that other accounts can edit a private research project.

Limitations: Findings use source inspection at revision 620de9f7, not live-provider tests. Networks are bounded; missing metadata affects results. Shared collection editing and automated literature monitoring remain unverified.

Sources: SciMaps project workspace implementation; SciMaps co-citation implementation; SciMaps descriptive analysis implementation; SciMaps academic feed implementation

VOSviewer

Official VOSviewer website

Product details for VOSviewer

VOSviewer constructs and visualizes bibliometric networks from bibliographic records or supported data-provider APIs. Its documented methods include co-authorship, co-citation, bibliographic coupling and term co-occurrence, with visualization and data-cleaning controls. It is relevant when the research task concerns the relationships in a defined bibliographic dataset. The desktop analysis application and VOSviewer Online visualization should be distinguished. Saved maps and shared visualizations are also different from a multi-user editable literature collection. Data-source coverage and reference fields determine which network types can be constructed.

Limitations: Some inputs lack the reference fields required for citation-based analyses. Desktop analysis, online visualization and external bibliographic-provider access are distinct. Saved publication maps establish persistence, while collection organization remains incompletely verified.

Sources: VOSviewer features; VOSviewer manual 1.6.21

How to read this comparison

SciMaps publishes this comparison and is included as a compared product. Assessments use documented features and cited evidence. Functionality can change; verify critical requirements with each provider.

  • Supported: evidence establishes the full definition under the stated conditions.
  • Partial: evidence establishes part of the task, but a named required element is missing.
  • Not supported: affirmative evidence establishes absence in the assessed scope.
  • Not verified: evidence does not establish a conclusion; this does not mean unavailable.

Paid plans, ordinary limits, integrations and versions are reported separately from capability status. An export to another tool does not establish that the exporting tool performs its analysis. Source inspection establishes implementation evidence; it does not establish current deployment operation.

Evidence is reviewed every 90 days, or every 30 days for access- or version-sensitive claims. Dates and provenance appear in evidence disclosures. Review age never changes a status automatically. A source-access check alone does not refresh an assessment.

Suggest a documented correction — sign-in required. Include the product, capability and supporting source URL.

Source index

  1. VOSviewer features — CWTS, Leiden University. Official features. Data, visualization and techniques Checked ; accessible when checked.
  2. VOSviewer manual 1.6.21 — CWTS, Leiden University. Official documentation. Sections 3.5.1, 3.5.4 and 4: maps, DOI files and bibliographic inputs Version/scope: 1.6.21. Checked ; accessible when checked.
  3. Bibliometrix overview — Bibliometrix / K-Synth. Official features. Data collection, science mapping and outputs Checked ; accessible when checked.
  4. Biblioshiny workflow and analytics — Bibliometrix / K-Synth. Official documentation. Data Management; Analytics; Knowledge Structure Analysis Checked ; accessible when checked.
  5. Bibliometrix data importing and converting — Bibliometrix authors. Official documentation. Source-specific bibliographic files; convert2df records and field tags Checked ; accessible when checked.
  6. ResearchRabbit features — ResearchRabbit. Official features. Search, recommendations and maps Checked ; accessible when checked.
  7. Organizing articles with Collections — ResearchRabbit. Official documentation. Collections, subcollections, moving and copying articles Checked ; accessible when checked.
  8. How to share papers and collections — ResearchRabbit. Official documentation. Viewer/editor roles, public links and BibTeX/RIS/CSV export Checked ; accessible when checked.
  9. Litmaps features — Litmaps. Official features. Search, visualize, share and monitor Checked ; accessible when checked.
  10. Import Articles into Litmaps — Litmaps. Official documentation. BibTeX, RIS, PubMed and manual bulk IDs Checked ; accessible when checked.
  11. Export Articles from Litmaps — Litmaps. Official documentation. Export records as BibTeX, RIS or CSV Checked ; accessible when checked.
  12. Litmaps Teams — Litmaps. Official documentation. Team subscription, shared workspaces and editor/viewer roles Checked ; accessible when checked.
  13. What is ResearchGate? — ResearchGate. Official documentation. Profiles, research, professional connections and community Checked ; accessible when checked.
  14. What is my Profile? — ResearchGate. Official documentation. Profile, research, stats, following and private saved list Checked ; accessible when checked.
  15. Following researchers — ResearchGate. Official documentation. Researcher following and personalized Home Feed Checked ; accessible when checked.
  16. Citations — ResearchGate. Official documentation. Citing publications, original citation context and coverage limitations Checked ; accessible when checked.
  17. SciMaps project workspace implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Owner-scoped collections; reference and citing-paper imports Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  18. SciMaps spreadsheet parser — SciMaps repository. Repository code. CSV/TSV/XLSX parsing and bounds Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  19. SciMaps co-citation implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Scoped analysis, aggregation and safeguards Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  20. SciMaps coupling implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Shared-reference analysis and method log Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  21. SciMaps co-authorship implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Author, organization and country analysis Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  22. SciMaps keyword analysis implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Keyword sources, normalization and exclusions Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  23. SciMaps descriptive analysis implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Year/entity counts, country production and citation semantics Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  24. SciMaps researcher network implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Researcher profiles, following and connections Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  25. SciMaps academic feed implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Posts, recommendations, comments and sharing Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  26. SciMaps report formats — SciMaps repository. Repository code. PDF and DOCX report formats Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  27. SciMaps source export implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. Selected project sources as Scopus-style CSV Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  28. Citations and references in ResearchRabbit — ResearchRabbit. Official documentation. Article details: Refs and Cited by lists and visualization Checked ; accessible when checked.
  29. ResearchRabbit free tier and RR+ — ResearchRabbit. Official documentation. Shared collections, BibTeX import/export, citation browsing and advanced search restrictions Checked ; accessible when checked.
  30. SciMaps descriptive report export implementation — SciMaps repository. Repository code. exportDocx; report scope, findings, section notes, counting methods and reproducibility metadata Version/scope: 620de9f7. Checked ; local repository inspected; public link access not verified.
  31. Bibliometrix official release notes — Bibliometrix maintainers. Official documentation. 5.5.0: Biblioshiny OpenAlex text-query filters and exact matching Version/scope: 5.5.0. Checked ; accessible when checked.
  32. Biblioshiny included workflow and network help — Bibliometrix maintainers. Official documentation. Import/Load export and reload; API query builder; Co-occurrence Network fields and weights Version/scope: Upstream master help inspected 2026-10-20; installed releases may differ. Checked ; accessible when checked.
  33. Do a literature review with Litmaps — Litmaps. Official documentation. Find starting articles: topic query and article results Checked ; accessible when checked.
  34. Search algorithms in Litmaps — Litmaps. Official documentation. Shared Citations and References; Common Authors; Similar Text Checked ; accessible when checked.